Sometimes I can be a bit emotional when it comes to changes in the software product I work with on a daily bases. An example of that was my previous blog that I took offline in order to do some editing making it less about emotion and more about facts.
The emotion is probably justified for a few reasons of which most the fact that Navision, NAV, Business Central (I stopped caring about the name) provides a living for me and my family but it’s more than that.
Around our product there is a community that stands out from almost any other community I’ve seen. We have a large number of events that are not organised by Microsoft but by partners, customers or in one case even by one single guy. Not because they make money doing it, but because they think it’s nessesairy.
What I’ve seen is that even if the product changes and evolves in complexity the people around it don’t stop loving it. Sometimes Microsoft makes a decision around the product that could have been done differently but then we always have the community steering them back. It has happend so many times that I lost count.
When I read the comments to my blog it looks as if a majority agrees that working in C/Side is faster than working in Visual Studio Code and we lost a great deal of simplicity. I know that there are also many who disagree with this statement.
One community that I’ve experienced to be even more passionate about their product is the Great Plains community. When I statet that in my opinion Business Central is replacing the GP product I did not got love and hugs.
The fact is though that I’m a bit jealous of the Great Plains people and sometimes I wished that instead of NAV, GP was the platform of choice to move to the cloud.
Why, you might think. Wel, because Microsoft is still maintaining GP, adding new features and keeping it compatible with modern versions of Windows. But the software is not overhauled like NAV.
Imagine that for the next decade or more we could work wiith C/Side and sell new licenses. Including to be able to use the windows client. Many would love that,
The fact that Business Central is based on NAV makes it easy for me to join the new community but it has cost us a great level of productivity,
It’s going to be very interesting to see what Microsoft will do after Wave II. I cannot wait to go to Vienna and see the roadmap.
Personally I think we can all use some slowing down after all the changes in the last few years. If the Microsoft slide for Wave III said “stabilise the product” I would stand up and cheer.
From a business value perspective integration scenario’s are the most important area for the future. Where Visual Studio Code and AL get all the attention I would spend my time learning the API and if I had a vertical solution I would redevelop it on another platform than AL.
The future of Business Central is international. BC is the only flexible SMB solution with localizations and translations all over the globe.